C.V. & Publication list
If you want to have a look at my C.V., you may push the button:
[35] H. de Swart and S. Wintein. Elections and Fair Division: an introduction to Social Choice Theory, 2025. Studies in Choice and Welfare series, Springer.
[34] S. Wintein. A theory of fairness from consistency. Theory and Decision, 2025, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-025-10081-9.
[33] S. Wintein. To be fair: claims have amounts and strengths. Social Choice and Welfare, 2024, 62, pp. 443-464.
[32] S. Wintein and C. Heilmann. How to be absolutely fair, part I: the fairness formula, Economics and Philosophy, 2024, 40, pp. 626-649.
[31] S.Wintein and C. Heilmann. How to be absolutely fair, part II: philosophy meets economics, Economics and Philosophy, 2024, 40, pp. 650-672.
[30] S. Wintein. The Modal-Epistemic Argument Self-undermined. SOPHIA, 2023, 62, pp. 1-15.
[29] S. Wintein and C. Heilmann. Liberal political equality does not imply proportional representation. Social Choice and Welfare 59, pp. 63–91, 2022.
[28] S. Wintein and C. Heilmann. Fairness and Fair Division. In: C. Heilmann & J. Reiss (Eds.) Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Economics, 2022, pp. 255-267.
[27] C. Heilmann and S. Wintein. No Envy: Jan Tinbergen on Fairness. Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics, 2021, 14(1), pp. 222–245.
[26] C. Heilmann, S. Wintein., R. Hinz, and E. Dekker. Translation of Jan Tinbergen’s Mathematical Psychology. Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics, 2021, 14(1), pp. 210–221.
[25] S. Wintein and C. Heilmann. Theories of Fairness and Aggregation. Erkenntnis, 2020, 85, pp. 715-738
[24] S. Wintein and C. Heilmann. Eerlijkheid: het proportionele-claims idee. Algemeen Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Wijsbegeerte, 2020, 112(4), pp. 494-498.
[23] S. Wintein. The Modal-Epistemic Argument for the Existence of God is Flawed. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 2018, 84, pp. 307-322.
[22] S. Wintein and C. Heilmann. Extreme Rijkdom Eerlijk Verdeeld. Algemeen Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Wijsbegeerte, 2017, 109 (4), pp.469-474.
[21] S. Wintein and C. Heilmann. Dividing the Indivisible: Apportionment and Philosophical Theories of Fairness. Philosophy, Politics and Economics, 2018, 17(1), pp.51-74.
[20] R. Muskens and S. Wintein. Interpolation in 16-valued Trilattice Logics. Studia Logica, 2018, 106,: 345-370.
[19] S. Wintein and R. Muskens. Interpolation Methods for Dunn Logics and their Extensions. Studia Logica, 2017, 105(6), pp. 1319-1347.
[18] S. Wintein. From Closure Games to Strong Kleene Truth. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 2016, 57(2), pp. 153-179.
[17] S. Wintein. On all Strong Kleene Generalizations of Classical Logic. Studia Logica, 2016, 104, pp. 503-545.
[16] C. Heilmann and S. Wintein. How to be fairer. Synthese, 2017, 194 (9), pp. 3475–3499.
[15] S. Wintein and R. Muskens. A Gentzen Calculus for Nothing but the Truth. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 2016, 45(4), pp. 451-465.
[14] R. Muskens and S. Wintein. Analytic Tableaux for all of Sixteen3. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 2015, 44(5), pp. 473-487
[13] S. Wintein and R. Muskens. From Bi-Facial Truth to Bi-Facial Proof, Studia Logica, 2015, 103, pp. 545-558.
[12] S. Wintein. On the Strict-Tolerant Conception of Truth. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 2014, 92(1), pp. 71-90.
[11] S. Wintein. Alternative ways for truth to behave when there’s no vicious reference. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 2014, 43, pp. 665-690.
[10] S.Wintein. Assertoric Semantics and the Computational Power of Self-referential Truth. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 2012, 41(2), pp.317-34
[9] S. Wintein. On the Behavior of True and False. Minds and Machines, 2012, 22(1), pp.1-24.
[8] S.Wintein. Playing with Truth. Ph.D. dissertation, 2012.
[7] S. Wintein and R. Muskens. A Calculus for Belnap’s Logic in Which Each Proof Consists of Two Trees. Logique et Analyse, 2012, 220, pp.643-656.
[6] S.Wintein. Modifying Kremer’s Modified Gupta-Belnap Desideratum. In: J. DeVuyst & L. Demey (Eds.), Future Directions for Logic: Proceedings of PhD’s in Logic 3, 2012, College Publications.
[5] S. Wintein. A Framework for Riddles about Truth that do not involve Self- Reference. Studia Logica, 2011, 98(3), pp.445-482
[4] S. Wintein. On languages that contain their own ungroundedness predicate. Logique et Analyse, 2011, 216, pp.599-615.
[3] S. Wintein. What makes a knight? Interfaces: Explorations in logic, language and computation, 2010, pp.25-37. Berlin: SpringerLink. (Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, 6211).
[2] S.Wintein. Computing with Self-reference. In: T. Achourioti, E. Andrade, & M. Staudacher (Eds.), Proceedings of the Amsterdam Graduate Philosophy Conference—Meaning and Truth, 2010, pp. 103-115. ILCC publications X- 2010-1.
[1] S. Wintein, P.E.M Borm, R.L.P Hendrickx and M. Quant. Multiple fund investment situations and related games. Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, 2006, 63(3), pp.413-426.
Below is a list of all my academic publications in chronological order. For more information about their content and links to the papers, navigate to Research.